Denied _President's Punishment Appeal

+1

 

"if someone who you think is "cheating" you should freeze him and SS him and not ban him straight a way."

Unless the player is blatant cheating.*

 

Staff will check ur log's etc, decide if you were actually cheating or no, gl!​

 

Not normal logs @Zphre

https://hastebin.com/zekicocihi

 

As far as i remember if you continue to spam the anti cheat they must tp to you and be sure that you are cheating and if you aren't looking blatant they must freeze you

 

I had doubts in the beginning so I constantly spectated him, but I made a conclusion after watching him fight and agreed that his hits were not normal. Just like what @Losmen said, his logs are not normal either which just supports me and goes against him. If you wish to be unbanned, either provide solid proof or change your plea to guilty. You have 24 hours.

 

@Zphre how is a fukn player supposed to provide evidence??? If anything, the staff member should need to provide evidence. Players shouldn’t have to record while they are on the server in case they get banned. You should have just screenshared him. You can’t say “provide evidence or change to guilty”. U realize how dumb that sounds? You should have been recording that whole time, and if you weren’t, lie and say that you are guilty cuz you are getting banned either way. Thats so dumb. Not trying to hate on Zphre, most of cold staff does this and it annoys the hell out of me. Ur probs still gonna deny his appeal but whatever. Why not just trust someone for once? You could either ban someone for like 20 or more days on a guess that his hits were weird, or u could unban him and 1. If he was hacking, he will stop. 2. If he was hacking and he keeps going, screenshare him, and 3. If he wasn’t hacking (which I don’t think he was), then u just did the right thing. If you ban him, you would legit just be banning him off of a hunch. Like I said, this is probs still gonna get Denied. Sorry for this lil rant k bai

 

I am not denying or accepting this appeal, and logs are sufficient enough proof if the player banned has no proof.

 

The anticheat sucks tho lol. And u should provide proof if he was SOOOOOO blatant

 

The log show he try to use a reach with ~40 ms...

 

don't know cuz http://prntscr.com/mpshbg stupid hastebin doesnt like me cuz im white wtf racist

 

I can't even view the logs

 

With low ms you shouldn’t get that many reach alerts. Zphre isn’t dumb and banned him for a good reason.

 

Im white too don't worry

+1

 

You can plea yourself as guilty, this will make reduce your ban and if you don’t plea yourself as guilty and refuse to admit, you may show evidence of you not cheating. Simple as that

 

Zphre should have to show evidence that he was cheating susg disgeveidgsheibsjdkwgevfjsudhdhfjduxhsh

 

Denied

I heard zphre's version, Ive seen the logs losmen provided us with, and I have decided not to unban you, you should have respect for zphre saying he wont handle your appeal himself..



Next time provide any sort of proof, like at all, even logs showing anything, to even make us doubt for one second, then we would maybe unbanned you, or made your ban shorter