Join 0 other players at play.coldnetwork.net
Discussion in 'Denied Appeals' started by SniperCoco, Mar 30, 2018.
r a n d o m
you cant even talk you joined today random
You seriously banned him off of that?
I can ban for the slightest things, if the arguing continues, I will warn.
No you really shouldn't ban unless you have good sufficient evidence not 1 slightly weird hit where you wouldn't be able to lock onto you anyway because you're in /v.
Lol if you call that hacks then I’ll make sure to kms as Nick told me to
Just because Badjumpbug is trying to prove himself innocent doesn’t means he is arguing. This is a common PvP thing. You face away to pot. He can’t lock his “aim bot/kill aura” onto you. I can prove that you cannot see or lock onto a staff member when the staff member is in /v.
Stop post farming
Stop arguing, rate it with a -1, Neutral, or +1.
Is that how you defend yourself? Telling someone not to farm posts is not arguing. You can remove his posts.
I don't know what to say, already I don't know if I want to go -1 +1 or neutral. I will think. soon.
In my opinion, the proof that was provided is not enough to ban without a screen share.
I had 2 other staff also agree, they both told me it was enough to ban.
If there is more evidence please show me. Yes I do agree he looked sketchy but it is not enough for a ban without screen sharing.
Wrong. Some kind of hacks has aimbot that hit invisible people (even if they are in vanish).
Believe me, I tested it myself.
Oh okay, but unfortunately he is not using any. Banning someone for only 0.90 ms sketchy move isn’t worth banning someone. Losem should have done a screen share. Same goes with someone using reach (hackusated) but at the end he gets banned without a screen share.