No you really shouldn't ban unless you have good sufficient evidence not 1 slightly weird hit where you wouldn't be able to lock onto you anyway because you're in /v.
Just because Badjumpbug is trying to prove himself innocent doesn’t means he is arguing. This is a common PvP thing. You face away to pot. He can’t lock his “aim bot/kill aura” onto you. I can prove that you cannot see or lock onto a staff member when the staff member is in /v.
Is that how you defend yourself? Telling someone not to farm posts is not arguing. You can remove his posts.
If there is more evidence please show me. Yes I do agree he looked sketchy but it is not enough for a ban without screen sharing.
Wrong. Some kind of hacks has aimbot that hit invisible people (even if they are in vanish). Believe me, I tested it myself.
Oh okay, but unfortunately he is not using any. Banning someone for only 0.90 ms sketchy move isn’t worth banning someone. Losem should have done a screen share. Same goes with someone using reach (hackusated) but at the end he gets banned without a screen share.
Join our Discord