Denied Badjumpbug's Punishment Appeal

Discussion in 'Denied Appeals' started by SniperCoco, Mar 30, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Plssub

    Plssub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    Lol roasted
     
  2. Aphelios

    Aphelios Mini Polarbear
    Banned Demon

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,045
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +203 / 5
    r a n d o m
     
  3. Aphelios

    Aphelios Mini Polarbear
    Banned Demon

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,045
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +203 / 5
    you cant even talk you joined today random
     
  4. m

    m Papa Polarbear
        :pray:                  Halloween                 

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2017
    Messages:
    3,072
    Likes Received:
    2,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,395 / 71
    You seriously banned him off of that?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Plssub

    Plssub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
  6. Losmen

    Losmen Co-Owner
                    

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +201 / 12
    I can ban for the slightest things, if the arguing continues, I will warn.
     
  7. m

    m Papa Polarbear
        :pray:                  Halloween                 

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2017
    Messages:
    3,072
    Likes Received:
    2,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,395 / 71
    No you really shouldn't ban unless you have good sufficient evidence not 1 slightly weird hit where you wouldn't be able to lock onto you anyway because you're in /v.
     
  8. SniperCoco

    SniperCoco Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Lol if you call that hacks then I’ll make sure to kms as Nick told me to
     
  9. SniperCoco

    SniperCoco Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Just because Badjumpbug is trying to prove himself innocent doesn’t means he is arguing. This is a common PvP thing. You face away to pot. He can’t lock his “aim bot/kill aura” onto you. I can prove that you cannot see or lock onto a staff member when the staff member is in /v.
     
  10. Vexyh

    Vexyh Mini Polarbear

    Joined:
    May 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,402
    Likes Received:
    769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 37
  11. Plssub

    Plssub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    Lol lõl
     
  12. SniperCoco

    SniperCoco Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Stop post farming
     
  13. Losmen

    Losmen Co-Owner
                    

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +201 / 12
    Stop arguing, rate it with a -1, Neutral, or +1.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  14. SniperCoco

    SniperCoco Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Is that how you defend yourself? Telling someone not to farm posts is not arguing. You can remove his posts.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Zaak

    Zaak Penguin Extremist

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2017
    Messages:
    621
    Likes Received:
    110
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +196 / 25
    I don't know what to say, already I don't know if I want to go -1 +1 or neutral. I will think. soon.
     
  16. osich

    osich Penguin Extremist

    Joined:
    May 16, 2017
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +128 / 3
    +1
    In my opinion, the proof that was provided is not enough to ban without a screen share.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. Losmen

    Losmen Co-Owner
                    

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +201 / 12
    I had 2 other staff also agree, they both told me it was enough to ban.
     
  18. osich

    osich Penguin Extremist

    Joined:
    May 16, 2017
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +128 / 3
    If there is more evidence please show me. Yes I do agree he looked sketchy but it is not enough for a ban without screen sharing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. NotExposing

    NotExposing New Member
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2018
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +35 / 7
    Wrong. Some kind of hacks has aimbot that hit invisible people (even if they are in vanish).
    Believe me, I tested it myself.
     
  20. SniperCoco

    SniperCoco Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Oh okay, but unfortunately he is not using any. Banning someone for only 0.90 ms sketchy move isn’t worth banning someone. Losem should have done a screen share. Same goes with someone using reach (hackusated) but at the end he gets banned without a screen share.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.