im just gonna say, it isnt the best i was autoclicking and reaching hella blatantly gg did this for 20 minutes
just because it doesn't auto ban doesn't mean it doesn't send out alerts. Staff were probably not even on or were busy. Idek how you got caught in the first place lol
maybe it should auto ban ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and in my opinion, there should be at least like one staff member all the time, maybe that's just me idk. And I understand if they're busy but there should still be at least one patrolling because there are a lot of cheaters on the network. How do you not understand how I got banned? I was using 3.8 block reach mate.
66 players online.. I already see, you did it at a time when there was most likely 2 staff-members online at highest. AntiCheat detects 3,8 easily, there's no single doubt about that, and you got caught. You aren't the only cheater where we as staff-members are busy with, so it took a while.
If AutoBan is enabled, like 70% of the people would be false banned. We have a decent playerbase that play with +250ms and it false flags a lot.
I mean we all gave up at this point, we were constantly forcing Nick to buy a new anti cheat... They did nothing for 1 year+
The anti-cheat is decent in my experience, and how can you call an anti-cheat bad after you got caught, makes no sense to me. And to whoever said auto ban, I hosted a sumo event and almost everyone had 200+ ms, so there would be multiple false bans in the process. Nice renders btw though .
Because anticheats (in my opinion) should autoban. If they can't enable autoban because the anticheat would false ban, then it's a bad anticheat. Thank you
Why should it auto ban for all alerts, alerts don't confirm they are hacking, they just give staff a little bit of insight into who to watch, also they are saving half of the practice community on cold from being banned as most of them would set off many alerts due too there Ping.
For example getting a ping spike and hitting someone sometimes sets off reach alerts. Imagine if the anticheat banned for that. Same problem with AntiKB and what not.